AU vs. ESEA
AU (AngloGold Ashanti Limited) and ESEA (Euroseas Ltd) are both stocks. AU operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while ESEA operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, AU returned 19.77%/yr vs 23.25%/yr for ESEA. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AU vs. ESEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AU achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than ESEA's 25.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AU has underperformed ESEA with an annualized return of 19.77%, while ESEA has yielded a comparatively higher 23.25% annualized return.
AU
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -20.15%
- YTD
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 92.09%
- 3Y*
- 56.61%
- 5Y*
- 34.08%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
ESEA
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -7.24%
- YTD
- 25.78%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 72.75%
- 3Y*
- 77.90%
- 5Y*
- 40.80%
- 10Y*
- 23.25%
AU vs. ESEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 1.89% | 288.18% | 25.43% | -2.68% | -5.09% | -4.87% | 1.90% | 78.89% | 23.96% | -2.23% |
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 25.78% | 140.95% | 23.60% | 83.39% | -21.02% | 358.75% | 33.42% | -27.32% | -58.82% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AU and ESEA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.09 |
The correlation between AU and ESEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (10 years) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AU:
$42.63B
ESEA:
$468.95M
AU:
$6.85
ESEA:
$18.99
AU:
12.32
ESEA:
3.53
AU:
0.14
ESEA:
0.08
AU:
3.83
ESEA:
2.06
AU:
4.99
ESEA:
0.96
AU:
$11.17B
ESEA:
$227.36M
AU:
$5.82B
ESEA:
$148.47M
AU:
$5.58B
ESEA:
$165.74M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AU vs. ESEA — Risk / Return Rank
AU
ESEA
AU vs. ESEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) and Euroseas Ltd (ESEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AU | ESEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.53 | 3.98 | -1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 8.19 | -1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AU | ESEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 1.65 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.74 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.25 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | -0.11 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
AU vs. ESEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AU drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, smaller than the maximum ESEA drawdown of -99.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AU and ESEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AU | ESEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.12% | -99.84% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.59% | -18.36% | -18.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.71% | -38.00% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.75% | -51.28% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.91% | -95.54% | +27.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | -87.23% | +54.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.07% | -85.40% | +39.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.55% | 8.91% | +4.64% |
Volatility
AU vs. ESEA - Volatility Comparison
AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) and Euroseas Ltd (ESEA) have volatilities of 18.53% and 17.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AU | ESEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.53% | 17.94% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.72% | 33.13% | +12.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.70% | 44.42% | +13.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.98% | 55.23% | -6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.72% | 94.54% | -44.82% |
Dividends
AU vs. ESEA - Dividend Comparison
AU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than ESEA's 5.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 5.45% | 2.96% | 1.78% | 1.14% | 2.26% | 2.58% | 0.49% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.93% |
ESEA Euroseas Ltd | 5.37% | 16.23% | 6.63% | 6.42% | 8.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AU vs. ESEA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AngloGold Ashanti Limited and Euroseas Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AU vs. ESEA - Profitability Comparison
AU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 3.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
ESEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a gross profit of 37.73M and revenue of 55.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
AU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.8%.
ESEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported an operating income of 34.03M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.0%.
AU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
ESEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Euroseas Ltd reported a net income of 32.52M and revenue of 55.84M, resulting in a net margin of 58.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AU and ESEA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AU has higher volatility (18.53%) compared to ESEA (17.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AU dropped -90.12% vs ESEA's -99.84%.
ESEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AU and ESEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer