PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP.L's -20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L has outperformed SPPP.L with an annualized return of 24.45%, while SPPP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.71% annualized return.


ATYM.L

1D
4.08%
1M
-6.69%
YTD
-4.50%
6M
-5.06%
1Y
82.02%
3Y*
38.85%
5Y*
25.14%
10Y*
24.45%

SPPP.L

1D
-1.64%
1M
-17.86%
YTD
-20.95%
6M
-28.29%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
17.64%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
3.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
-4.50%141.04%0.93%11.73%-18.78%88.92%22.40%-8.35%26.97%35.25%
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
-20.95%104.81%-8.43%-10.70%24.01%-10.35%7.05%17.67%-9.95%-6.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and SPPP.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2014

0.16

Over the past year, ATYM.L and SPPP.L have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SPPP.L
SPPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATYM.LSPPP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.12

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

0.48

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.43

1.09

+4.34

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and SPPP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.06%, which is greater than SPPP.L's maximum drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and SPPP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATYM.LSPPP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.06%

-44.86%

-48.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.50%

-43.34%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.87%

-43.34%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.50%

-43.34%

-14.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.65%

-44.86%

-23.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.98%

-43.34%

+19.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.66%

-19.62%

-43.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.05%

19.23%

-4.18%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L - Volatility Comparison

Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) at 10.41%. This indicates that ATYM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATYM.LSPPP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.09%

10.41%

+5.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.84%

39.73%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.66%

46.36%

-0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.27%

30.57%

+9.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.47%

27.77%

+11.70%

Dividends

ATYM.L vs. SPPP.L - Dividend Comparison

ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while SPPP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.75%0.71%1.71%1.91%0.91%7.14%
SPPP.L
Invesco Physical Platinum
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATYM.L and SPPP.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATYM.L and SPPP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer