SPPP.L vs. PPLT

In the year-to-date period, SPPP.L achieves a 3.30% return, which is significantly lower than PPLT's 10.23% return. Over the past 10 years, SPPP.L has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of -0.22%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.89% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPPP.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PPLT's 0.60% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current SPPP.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the PPLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPPP.L and PPLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither SPPP.L nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum SPPP.L drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, smaller than the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPPP.L and PPLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Invesco Physical Platinum (SPPP.L) is 4.59%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that SPPP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.