ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO
ATYM.L (Atalaya Mining Ltd) and ABX.TO (Barrick Gold Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ATYM.L in Copper, ABX.TO in Gold. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L returned 24.45%/yr vs 7.80%/yr for ABX.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while ABX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ABX.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -4.50% return, which is significantly higher than ABX.TO's -13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ATYM.L has outperformed ABX.TO with an annualized return of 24.45%, while ABX.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.80% annualized return.
ATYM.L
- 1D
- 4.08%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 6M
- -5.06%
- 1Y
- 82.02%
- 3Y*
- 38.85%
- 5Y*
- 25.14%
- 10Y*
- 24.45%
ABX.TO
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -12.72%
- YTD
- -13.38%
- 6M
- -14.60%
- 1Y
- 87.83%
- 3Y*
- 30.63%
- 5Y*
- 16.71%
- 10Y*
- 7.80%
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATYM.L Atalaya Mining Ltd | -4.50% | 141.04% | 0.93% | 11.73% | -18.78% | 88.92% | 22.40% | -8.35% | 26.97% | 35.25% |
ABX.TO Barrick Gold Corporation | -13.38% | 166.55% | -10.59% | 2.82% | 6.91% | -13.12% | 21.01% | 32.25% | -0.19% | -16.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATYM.L and ABX.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2007 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, ATYM.L and ABX.TO have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ATYM.L:
£1.27B
ABX.TO:
CA$87.35B
ATYM.L:
€0.55
ABX.TO:
$3.61
ATYM.L:
17.13
ABX.TO:
10.15
ATYM.L:
0.82
ABX.TO:
0.12
ATYM.L:
3.02
ABX.TO:
3.25
ATYM.L:
1.93
ABX.TO:
2.25
ATYM.L:
€473.55M
ABX.TO:
$19.02B
ATYM.L:
€148.66M
ABX.TO:
$10.15B
ATYM.L:
€170.88M
ABX.TO:
$12.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATYM.L
ABX.TO
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATYM.L | ABX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.30 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 7.45 | -2.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.06%, which is greater than ABX.TO's maximum drawdown of -88.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and ABX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATYM.L | ABX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.06% | -88.04% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.50% | -26.79% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.87% | -26.79% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.50% | -38.77% | -18.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -68.65% | -57.55% | -11.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.98% | -26.71% | +2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.66% | -44.28% | -18.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.05% | 11.83% | +3.22% |
Volatility
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Volatility Comparison
Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a higher volatility of 16.09% compared to Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) at 14.34%. This indicates that ATYM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATYM.L | ABX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.09% | 14.34% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.84% | 33.78% | +5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.66% | 44.49% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.27% | 34.03% | +6.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.47% | 35.46% | +4.01% |
Dividends
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than ABX.TO's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABX.TO Barrick Gold Corporation | 2.42% | 1.22% | 2.46% | 2.27% | 5.06% | 3.96% | 1.33% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.72% | 0.47% | 1.43% |
ATYM.L Atalaya Mining Ltd | 0.75% | 0.71% | 1.71% | 1.91% | 0.91% | 7.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atalaya Mining Ltd and Barrick Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATYM.L vs. ABX.TO - Profitability Comparison
ATYM.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a gross profit of 43.43M and revenue of 120.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
ABX.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.97B and revenue of 5.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.
ATYM.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported an operating income of 37.65M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.2%.
ABX.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.
ATYM.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atalaya Mining Ltd reported a net income of 28.39M and revenue of 120.87M, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.
ABX.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATYM.L and ABX.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATYM.L and ABX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer