ATTR vs. FFLS
ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and FFLS (The Future Fund Long/Short ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for FFLS.
Performance
ATTR vs. FFLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly higher than FFLS's -0.26% return.
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FFLS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- -0.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATTR vs. FFLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.25% | 0.58% |
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF | -0.26% | -1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATTR and FFLS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATTR vs. FFLS — Risk / Return Rank
ATTR
FFLS
ATTR vs. FFLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATTR | FFLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.81 | 0.80 | +2.01 |
Drawdowns
ATTR vs. FFLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum FFLS drawdown of -11.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and FFLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATTR | FFLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -11.05% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -4.96% | +4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -3.09% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.07% | — |
Volatility
ATTR vs. FFLS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATTR | FFLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97% | 8.94% | -5.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 11.23% | -8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.97% | 11.23% | -8.26% |
ATTR vs. FFLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FFLS's 1.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATTR vs. FFLS - Dividend Comparison
ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF | 6.59% | 6.58% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATTR and FFLS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.
FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and The Future Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 1.75% for FFLS.
Find the right allocation for ATTR and FFLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer