ATTR vs. BTAL
ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and BTAL (AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ATTR is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Arin Risk Advisors, while BTAL is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AGF. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for BTAL.
Performance
ATTR vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -21.75% return.
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTAL
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 6M
- -20.50%
- 1Y
- -36.96%
- 3Y*
- -13.01%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -5.50%
ATTR vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 3.44% | 0.53% |
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -21.75% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATTR and BTAL is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATTR vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank
ATTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTAL
ATTR vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATTR | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.74 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATTR vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and BTAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATTR | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -52.70% | +50.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -37.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -51.23% | +50.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -22.05% | +21.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.21% | — |
Volatility
ATTR vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATTR | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.28% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 22.83% | -19.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 19.10% | -15.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 17.36% | -14.19% |
ATTR vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 1.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATTR vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison
ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 3.18% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATTR and BTAL have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for BTAL.
BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
ATTR is categorized as Long-Short, while BTAL is Equity Market Neutral. They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and AGF. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 1.40% for BTAL.
Find the right allocation for ATTR and BTAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer