ATTR vs. BTAL
ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and BTAL (AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ATTR is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Arin Risk Advisors, while BTAL is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AGF. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for BTAL.
Performance
ATTR vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -17.44% return.
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTAL
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- 6M
- -14.66%
- YTD
- -17.44%
- 1Y
- -28.44%
- 3Y*
- -9.44%
- 5Y*
- -4.93%
- 10Y*
- -4.73%
ATTR vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.60% | 0.53% |
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -17.44% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATTR and BTAL is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATTR vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank
ATTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BTAL
ATTR vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATTR | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.81 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.83 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATTR vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and BTAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATTR | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -52.70% | +50.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -48.54% | +48.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -22.17% | +21.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.24% | — |
Volatility
ATTR vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATTR | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 23.44% | -20.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 19.27% | -16.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 17.39% | -14.18% |
ATTR vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 1.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATTR vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison
ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTAL AGF U.S. Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 3.01% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATTR and BTAL have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for BTAL.
BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
ATTR is categorized as Long-Short, while BTAL is Equity Market Neutral. They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and AGF. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 1.40% for BTAL.
Find the right allocation for ATTR and BTAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer