PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATRO vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATRO vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astronics Corporation (ATRO) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATRO achieves a 76.99% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 92.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRO has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 12.28%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.97% annualized return.


ATRO

1D
1.27%
1M
19.87%
YTD
76.99%
6M
76.47%
1Y
168.08%
3Y*
74.20%
5Y*
37.93%
10Y*
12.28%

IESC

1D
2.53%
1M
10.63%
YTD
92.75%
6M
62.95%
1Y
175.21%
3Y*
139.60%
5Y*
70.53%
10Y*
48.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATRO vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATRO
Astronics Corporation
76.99%239.85%-8.38%69.13%-14.17%-9.30%-52.67%-8.21%-13.21%22.55%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
92.75%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between ATRO and IESC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 1998

0.17

Over the past year, ATRO and IESC have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATRO:

$3.67B

IESC:

$15.14B

EPS

ATRO:

$1.22

IESC:

$18.85

PE Ratio

ATRO:

78.55

IESC:

39.78

PEG Ratio

ATRO:

6.88

IESC:

0.48

PS Ratio

ATRO:

4.02

IESC:

4.17

PB Ratio

ATRO:

22.69

IESC:

14.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATRO:

$886.81M

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATRO:

$272.44M

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATRO:

$74.47M

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATRO vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATRO
ATRO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ATRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ATRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATRO vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astronics Corporation (ATRO) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATROIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.23

8.09

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.48

22.98

+1.50

ATRO vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATRO Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATRO and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATRO vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATRO drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRO and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATROIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.12%

-98.32%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.39%

-21.80%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.89%

-49.23%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.90%

-54.22%

-8.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.52%

-54.28%

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.08%

-54.97%

+16.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.06%

7.66%

-0.60%

Volatility

ATRO vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

Astronics Corporation (ATRO) has a higher volatility of 20.40% compared to IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) at 15.69%. This indicates that ATRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATROIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.40%

15.69%

+4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.82%

50.65%

-10.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.08%

62.74%

-6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.27%

54.09%

+1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.87%

48.19%

+8.68%

Dividends

ATRO vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATRO nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ATRO vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astronics Corporation and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
230.62M
974.20M
(ATRO) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATRO vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Astronics Corporation and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
32.6%
24.5%
Portfolio components
ATRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astronics Corporation reported a gross profit of 75.13M and revenue of 230.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.6%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

ATRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astronics Corporation reported an operating income of 27.23M and revenue of 230.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

ATRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Astronics Corporation reported a net income of 25.54M and revenue of 230.62M, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATRO and IESC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATRO has higher volatility (20.40%) compared to IESC (15.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATRO dropped -90.12% vs IESC's -98.32%.

ATRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATRO and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer