ATRO vs. CLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Astronics Corporation (ATRO) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ATRO or CLF.
Key characteristics
| ATRO | CLF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.07% | -41.67% |
| 1Y Return | 14.53% | -18.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.59% | -18.63% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -9.41% | 7.91% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -10.02% | -1.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | -0.41 |
| Daily Std Dev | 41.37% | 38.45% |
| Max Drawdown | -92.38% | -98.79% |
| Current Drawdown | -75.20% | -87.88% |
Fundamentals
| ATRO | CLF | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $662.42M | $5.57B |
| EPS | -$0.35 | $0.09 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.46 | -0.22 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $741.40M | $21.01B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $163.64M | $1.22B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $21.40M | $1.70B |
Correlation
The correlation between ATRO and CLF is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ATRO vs. CLF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ATRO achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than CLF's -41.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRO has underperformed CLF with an annualized return of -10.02%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively higher -1.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ATRO vs. CLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astronics Corporation (ATRO) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ATRO vs. CLF - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATRO nor CLF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRO Astronics Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 3.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.35% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
ATRO vs. CLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATRO drawdown since its inception was -92.38%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRO and CLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ATRO vs. CLF - Volatility Comparison
Astronics Corporation (ATRO) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) have volatilities of 13.39% and 13.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ATRO vs. CLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astronics Corporation and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities