ATRO vs. CLF

In the year-to-date period, ATRO achieves a -5.05% return, which is significantly higher than CLF's -45.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ATRO has underperformed CLF with an annualized return of -5.94%, while CLF has yielded a comparatively higher 2.91% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astronics Corporation (ATRO) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ATRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the CLF Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATRO and CLF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither ATRO nor CLF has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum ATRO drawdown since its inception was -91.77%, smaller than the maximum CLF drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRO and CLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Astronics Corporation (ATRO) is 21.14%, while Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF) has a volatility of 25.62%. This indicates that ATRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Astronics Corporation and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.