PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATO vs. CAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATO vs. CAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than CAT's 57.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has underperformed CAT with an annualized return of 10.90%, while CAT has yielded a comparatively higher 31.08% annualized return.


ATO

1D
-0.61%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.81%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
10.90%

CAT

1D
4.84%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
57.36%
6M
44.09%
1Y
149.86%
3Y*
58.05%
5Y*
34.78%
10Y*
31.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATO vs. CAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
1.49%23.07%23.35%6.17%9.63%12.75%-12.73%23.14%10.39%18.41%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
57.36%60.30%24.66%25.95%18.60%15.95%26.97%19.51%-17.56%75.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ATO and CAT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1987

0.22

The correlation between ATO and CAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATO:

$28.23B

CAT:

$418.12B

EPS

ATO:

$8.23

CAT:

$20.07

PE Ratio

ATO:

20.45

CAT:

44.72

PEG Ratio

ATO:

2.01

CAT:

2.96

PS Ratio

ATO:

5.64

CAT:

5.95

PB Ratio

ATO:

0.98

CAT:

22.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATO:

$4.88B

CAT:

$70.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATO:

$1.61B

CAT:

$23.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATO:

$2.57B

CAT:

$15.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATO vs. CAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATO
ATO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATO Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CAT
CAT Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATO vs. CAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATOCATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.63

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

10.86

-9.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

35.61

-32.50

ATO vs. CAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the CAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATO and CAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATO vs. CAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum CAT drawdown of -73.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and CAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATOCATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-73.43%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-13.88%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-34.05%

+17.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-34.05%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

-43.36%

+10.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.02%

-4.56%

-7.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-19.73%

+11.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

4.23%

-0.11%

Volatility

ATO vs. CAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is 5.15%, while Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a volatility of 13.12%. This indicates that ATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATOCATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

13.12%

-7.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

28.52%

-17.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

35.18%

-19.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

30.79%

-12.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

30.98%

-9.74%

Dividends

ATO vs. CAT - Dividend Comparison

ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than CAT's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.30%2.15%2.36%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
0.67%1.02%1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%

Financials

ATO vs. CAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and Caterpillar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.96B
17.42B
(ATO) Total Revenue
(CAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATO vs. CAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atmos Energy Corporation and Caterpillar Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
35.1%
Portfolio components
ATO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.11B and revenue of 17.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.1%.

ATO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 764.80M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

CAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported an operating income of 3.09B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.

ATO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a net income of 581.90M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.

CAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caterpillar Inc. reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 17.42B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATO and CAT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAT has higher volatility (13.12%) compared to ATO (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATO dropped -51.94% vs CAT's -73.43%.

CAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATO and CAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer