PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CAT vs. CL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CAT and CL is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CAT vs. CL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%25,000.00%30,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
10,077.60%
25,535.71%
CAT
CL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CAT:

1.12

CL:

1.42

Sortino Ratio

CAT:

1.67

CL:

1.97

Omega Ratio

CAT:

1.21

CL:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

CAT:

1.86

CL:

1.29

Martin Ratio

CAT:

4.11

CL:

3.67

Ulcer Index

CAT:

7.15%

CL:

5.83%

Daily Std Dev

CAT:

26.16%

CL:

15.15%

Max Drawdown

CAT:

-73.43%

CL:

-58.91%

Current Drawdown

CAT:

-12.71%

CL:

-14.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAT:

$181.44B

CL:

$76.38B

EPS

CAT:

$21.52

CL:

$3.48

PE Ratio

CAT:

17.46

CL:

26.86

PEG Ratio

CAT:

1.69

CL:

2.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAT:

$65.66B

CL:

$20.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAT:

$23.58B

CL:

$12.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAT:

$16.27B

CL:

$5.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAT achieves a 25.05% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 18.93% return. Over the past 10 years, CAT has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 17.92%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 5.29% annualized return.


CAT

YTD

25.05%

1M

-5.35%

6M

12.78%

1Y

26.20%

5Y*

22.52%

10Y*

17.92%

CL

YTD

18.93%

1M

-1.98%

6M

-3.42%

1Y

21.33%

5Y*

8.69%

10Y*

5.29%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CAT vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CAT, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.121.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for CAT, currently valued at 1.67, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.671.97
The chart of Omega ratio for CAT, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.211.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for CAT, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.861.29
The chart of Martin ratio for CAT, currently valued at 4.11, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.004.113.67
CAT
CL

The current CAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the CL Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAT and CL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.12
1.42
CAT
CL

Dividends

CAT vs. CL - Dividend Comparison

CAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than CL's 2.13% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CAT
Caterpillar Inc.
1.49%1.69%1.93%2.07%2.26%2.56%2.58%1.97%3.32%4.33%2.84%1.89%
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
2.13%2.40%2.36%2.10%2.05%2.48%2.79%2.11%2.37%2.25%2.05%2.04%

Drawdowns

CAT vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAT drawdown since its inception was -73.43%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAT and CL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-12.71%
-14.30%
CAT
CL

Volatility

CAT vs. CL - Volatility Comparison

Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 4.36%. This indicates that CAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.51%
4.36%
CAT
CL

Financials

CAT vs. CL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caterpillar Inc. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab