PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATH.TO vs. TRIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while TRIN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRIN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than TRIN's 41.99% return.


ATH.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
44.95%
6M
45.36%
1Y
81.64%
3Y*
52.56%
5Y*
59.73%
10Y*
21.70%

TRIN

1D
3.97%
1M
16.13%
YTD
41.99%
6M
42.68%
1Y
61.47%
3Y*
32.03%
5Y*
24.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
44.95%31.89%27.82%73.03%102.52%395.83%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
41.99%10.72%24.56%50.31%-21.95%35.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ATH.TO and TRIN is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.11

The correlation between ATH.TO and TRIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATH.TO:

CA$4.95B

TRIN:

$1.48B

EPS

ATH.TO:

CA$0.45

TRIN:

$1.99

PE Ratio

ATH.TO:

22.82

TRIN:

8.91

PS Ratio

ATH.TO:

3.71

TRIN:

4.97

PB Ratio

ATH.TO:

2.68

TRIN:

1.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATH.TO:

CA$1.35B

TRIN:

$276.05M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATH.TO:

CA$518.18M

TRIN:

$219.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATH.TO:

CA$505.02M

TRIN:

$195.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATH.TO vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIN
TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATH.TOTRINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

4.39

-0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

11.72

+0.58

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATH.TO and TRIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -37.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and TRIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATH.TOTRINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.41%

-37.98%

-61.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.50%

-14.08%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-18.28%

-7.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.37%

-37.98%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.24%

0.00%

-45.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.56%

-7.88%

-65.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

5.26%

+1.40%

Volatility

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) at 8.23%. This indicates that ATH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATH.TOTRINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.89%

8.23%

+4.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.02%

17.00%

+15.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.70%

21.40%

+16.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.58%

27.45%

+22.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.54%

27.72%

+33.82%

Dividends

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
19.93%13.92%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%

Financials

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Athabasca Oil Corporation and Trinity Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
377.38M
83.32M
(ATH.TO) Total Revenue
(TRIN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATH.TO values in CAD, TRIN values in USD

ATH.TO vs. TRIN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Athabasca Oil Corporation and Trinity Capital Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
35.8%
79.3%
Portfolio components
ATH.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.

TRIN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 66.05M and revenue of 83.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.3%.

ATH.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

TRIN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 61.68M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.0%.

ATH.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.

TRIN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a net income of 45.52M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in a net margin of 54.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATH.TO and TRIN have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATH.TO and TRIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer