ATFV vs. IUSG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ATFV tracks the S&P 500 while IUSG tracks the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ATFV returned 12.57%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for IUSG. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ATFV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.

Performance

ATFV vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ATFV having a 10.01% return and IUSG slightly higher at 10.32%.

ATFV

• 1D: 2.68%
• 1M: -2.89%
• 6M: 12.26%
• YTD: 10.01%
• 1Y: 26.14%
• 3Y*: 33.90%
• 5Y*: 12.57%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.54%

IUSG

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 9.46%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 1Y: 21.76%
• 3Y*: 23.41%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 17.06%
• ALL TIME*: 8.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	$2.07M	$1.55M	$2.50M
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	$108.31M	$93.20M	$100.12M

ATFV vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	10.01%	38.20%	46.14%	32.75%	-35.97%	3.03%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	10.32%	21.23%	34.70%	29.28%	-28.81%	20.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and IUSG is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2021	0.86

The correlation between ATFV and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ATFV vs. IUSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ATFV	IUSG
Technology	43.2%	50.9%
Communication Services	23.6%	14.9%
Industrials	10.3%	7.7%
Healthcare	8.9%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	8.5%
Utilities	4.8%	0.4%
Financial Services	1.0%	8.6%
Basic Materials	-	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Energy	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.8%

Return for Risk

ATFV vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 35
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 37

IUSG

IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 44
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATFV vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATFV	IUSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	1.10	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	1.59	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.19	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	1.49	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	5.55	-1.83

ATFV vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and IUSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATFV	IUSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-63.41%	+18.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-13.07%	-5.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.01%	-22.28%	-6.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.34%	-32.21%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.11%	-4.25%	-3.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.46%	-21.33%	+3.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.05%	3.52%	+2.53%

Volatility

ATFV vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a higher volatility of 10.70% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) at 5.95%. This indicates that ATFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATFV	IUSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.70%	5.95%	+4.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.93%	14.56%	+7.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.95%	17.79%	+9.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.36%	21.19%	+6.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.99%	20.54%	+6.45%

ATFV vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATFV vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than IUSG's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF	0.50%	0.53%	0.59%	1.12%	1.07%	0.59%	0.93%	1.64%	1.32%	1.28%	1.48%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATFV and IUSG in my portfolio?

ATFV and IUSG have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATFV or IUSG?

ATFV has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to IUSG (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATFV dropped -45.34% vs IUSG's -63.41%.

Which ETF is better, ATFV or IUSG?

On 5-year performance, IUSG leads with 12.96% vs 12.57% for ATFV. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 5.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ATFV or IUSG?

Over the 5-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 12.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATFV or IUSG?

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ATFV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATFV or IUSG?

IUSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.18% for ATFV.

What is the main difference between ATFV and IUSG?

ATFV tracks S&P 500, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Alger and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ATFV and 0.04% for IUSG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.