ATD.TO vs. COST
ATD.TO (Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. ATD.TO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO returned 13.04%/yr vs 23.32%/yr for COST. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATD.TO vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATD.TO is traded in CAD, while COST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COST values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 16.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 13.04%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.32% annualized return.
ATD.TO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 16.59%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- 14.17%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
COST
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 12.97%
- 1Y
- 2.52%
- 3Y*
- 26.99%
- 5Y*
- 25.70%
- 10Y*
- 23.32%
ATD.TO vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 12.78% | -4.91% | 3.11% | 32.26% | 13.21% | 22.84% | 5.88% | 23.08% | 4.21% | 7.08% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 16.55% | -9.71% | 51.45% | 45.46% | -13.92% | 51.75% | 29.52% | 39.70% | 19.90% | 14.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATD.TO and COST is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
ATD.TO:
$2.90
COST:
$26.51
ATD.TO:
20.80
COST:
37.06
ATD.TO:
6.44
COST:
2.90
ATD.TO:
0.77
COST:
1.12
ATD.TO:
$73.29B
COST:
$293.59B
ATD.TO:
$13.89B
COST:
$11.12B
ATD.TO:
$6.26B
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATD.TO vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
ATD.TO
COST
ATD.TO vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATD.TO | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.02 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 0.05 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 0.12 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATD.TO vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -60.77%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATD.TO | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.77% | -33.74% | -27.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -14.89% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -23.58% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -30.01% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.61% | -30.01% | -2.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -10.25% | +9.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.30% | -7.21% | -3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.97% | 6.20% | -0.23% |
Volatility
ATD.TO vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) is 5.83%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that ATD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATD.TO | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 7.80% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.92% | 15.65% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.50% | 20.08% | +5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 23.87% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.51% | 23.14% | +1.37% |
Dividends
ATD.TO vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.97% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.72% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
Financials
ATD.TO vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATD.TO vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.24B and revenue of 21.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 757.20M and revenue of 21.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATD.TO and COST have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATD.TO and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer