ATD.TO vs. ASML
ATD.TO (Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. ATD.TO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO returned 12.70%/yr vs 34.52%/yr for ASML. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATD.TO is traded in CAD, while ASML is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ASML values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATD.TO achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 66.98% return. Over the past 10 years, ATD.TO has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 12.70%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 34.52% annualized return.
ATD.TO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 10.14%
- 6M
- 23.23%
- YTD
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 21.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.86%
ASML
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -10.40%
- 6M
- 29.66%
- YTD
- 66.98%
- 1Y
- 143.52%
- 3Y*
- 40.11%
- 5Y*
- 22.92%
- 10Y*
- 34.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 27.29%
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 21.36% | -4.91% | 3.11% | 32.26% | 13.21% | 22.84% | 5.88% | 23.08% | 4.21% | 7.08% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 66.98% | 49.36% | 0.12% | 36.58% | -26.08% | 64.05% | 62.12% | 85.59% | -2.21% | 45.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATD.TO and ASML is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2006 | 0.15 |
The correlation between ATD.TO and ASML shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ATD.TO:
CA$83.12B
ASML:
$670.25B
ATD.TO:
$4.47
ASML:
€27.54
ATD.TO:
14.46
ASML:
55.22
ATD.TO:
1.72
ASML:
3.63
ATD.TO:
0.59
ASML:
16.63
ATD.TO:
$76.51B
ASML:
€35.33B
ATD.TO:
$14.46B
ASML:
€18.63B
ATD.TO:
$7.16B
ASML:
€13.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATD.TO vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
ATD.TO
ASML
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATD.TO | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.43 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 8.67 | -6.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 24.96 | -21.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATD.TO drawdown since its inception was -61.10%, which is greater than ASML's maximum drawdown of -53.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATD.TO and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATD.TO | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.10% | -53.20% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -16.66% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.16% | -42.95% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.16% | -53.20% | +31.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.61% | -53.20% | +20.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -13.76% | +10.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -13.55% | +3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 5.81% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. (ATD.TO) is 12.49%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 17.93%. This indicates that ATD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATD.TO | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.49% | 17.93% | -5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.36% | 36.41% | -15.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.93% | 45.10% | -18.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 43.53% | -19.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 39.63% | -14.88% |
Dividends
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
ATD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than ASML's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.51% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
ATD.TO Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. | 0.93% | 1.07% | 0.90% | 0.76% | 0.79% | 0.70% | 0.69% | 1.06% | 1.15% | 1.09% | 1.00% | 0.72% |
Financials
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATD.TO vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
ATD.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.50B and revenue of 19.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.0%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
ATD.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 19.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
ATD.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc. reported a net income of 863.40M and revenue of 19.49B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATD.TO and ASML have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATD.TO and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer