PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATAT vs. SSRM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATAT vs. SSRM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATAT achieves a -16.93% return, which is significantly lower than SSRM's 30.38% return.


ATAT

1D
1.74%
1M
-3.48%
6M
-17.43%
YTD
-16.93%
1Y
-6.92%
3Y*
23.76%
5Y*
10Y*

SSRM

1D
-1.96%
1M
8.59%
6M
29.85%
YTD
30.38%
1Y
125.75%
3Y*
27.10%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATAT vs. SSRM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
-16.93%49.78%58.43%-2.92%16.26%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
30.38%214.94%-35.32%-29.94%4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ATAT and SSRM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATAT:

$4.45B

SSRM:

$5.93B

EPS

ATAT:

CN¥13.16

SSRM:

$3.26

PE Ratio

ATAT:

16.60

SSRM:

8.76

PEG Ratio

ATAT:

0.10

SSRM:

0.14

PS Ratio

ATAT:

2.86

SSRM:

3.27

PB Ratio

ATAT:

8.23

SSRM:

1.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥10.65B

SSRM:

$1.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥4.63B

SSRM:

$643.76M

EBITDA (TTM)

ATAT:

CN¥2.46B

SSRM:

$835.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATAT vs. SSRM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATAT
ATAT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
ATAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ATAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SSRM
SSRM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSRM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSRM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSRM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SSRM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSRM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATAT vs. SSRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATATSSRMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.31

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

4.18

-4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

10.21

-10.91

ATAT vs. SSRM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the SSRM Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATAT and SSRM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATAT vs. SSRM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATAT drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, smaller than the maximum SSRM drawdown of -91.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATAT and SSRM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATATSSRMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.91%

-91.68%

+44.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.32%

-31.28%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.96%

-73.41%

+42.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.69%

-34.34%

+10.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.14%

-57.09%

+36.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.87%

12.80%

-0.93%

Volatility

ATAT vs. SSRM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) is 9.00%, while SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) has a volatility of 19.50%. This indicates that ATAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATATSSRMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

19.50%

-10.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.89%

55.96%

-28.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.60%

67.57%

-29.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.52%

56.32%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.52%

53.08%

+5.44%

Dividends

ATAT vs. SSRM - Dividend Comparison

ATAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, while SSRM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATAT
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited
2.79%1.98%1.67%0.86%0.00%0.00%
SSRM
SSR Mining Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.60%1.79%1.13%

Financials

ATAT vs. SSRM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and SSR Mining Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.79B
581.78M
(ATAT) Total Revenue
(SSRM) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATAT values in CNY, SSRM values in USD

ATAT vs. SSRM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and SSR Mining Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
41.4%
0
Portfolio components
ATAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.16B and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

SSRM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 581.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ATAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 568.24M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

SSRM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported an operating income of 300.38M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.6%.

ATAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 460.55M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

SSRM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, SSR Mining Inc. reported a net income of 369.74M and revenue of 581.78M, resulting in a net margin of 63.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATAT and SSRM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSRM has higher volatility (19.50%) compared to ATAT (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATAT dropped -46.91% vs SSRM's -91.68%.

SSRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATAT and SSRM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer