ATAT vs. GFI
ATAT (Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. ATAT operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 3 years, ATAT returned 23.76%/yr vs 40.04%/yr for GFI. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATAT vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATAT achieves a -16.93% return, which is significantly higher than GFI's -19.53% return.
ATAT
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- -17.43%
- YTD
- -16.93%
- 1Y
- -6.92%
- 3Y*
- 23.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFI
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.90%
- 6M
- -23.10%
- YTD
- -19.53%
- 1Y
- 47.03%
- 3Y*
- 40.04%
- 5Y*
- 34.68%
- 10Y*
- 22.89%
ATAT vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATAT Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited | -16.93% | 49.78% | 58.43% | -2.92% | 16.26% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -19.53% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -13.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATAT and GFI is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
ATAT:
$4.45B
GFI:
$30.56B
ATAT:
CN¥13.16
GFI:
$5.39
ATAT:
16.60
GFI:
6.33
ATAT:
0.10
GFI:
0.10
ATAT:
2.86
GFI:
2.18
ATAT:
8.23
GFI:
3.62
ATAT:
CN¥10.65B
GFI:
$13.98B
ATAT:
CN¥4.63B
GFI:
$7.34B
ATAT:
CN¥2.46B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATAT vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
ATAT
GFI
ATAT vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATAT | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.18 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 1.04 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 2.44 | -3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATAT vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATAT drawdown since its inception was -46.91%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATAT and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATAT | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.91% | -88.05% | +41.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.32% | -46.66% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.96% | -46.66% | +15.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.69% | -42.88% | +19.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.14% | -44.24% | +24.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.87% | 19.83% | -7.96% |
Volatility
ATAT vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited (ATAT) is 9.00%, while Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a volatility of 19.88%. This indicates that ATAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATAT | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 19.88% | -10.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.89% | 47.77% | -19.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.60% | 61.30% | -23.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.52% | 52.77% | +5.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.52% | 54.77% | +3.75% |
Dividends
ATAT vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
ATAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than GFI's 5.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATAT Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited | 2.79% | 1.98% | 1.67% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.39% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
ATAT vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATAT vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
ATAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 1.16B and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
ATAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 568.24M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
ATAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Limited reported a net income of 460.55M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATAT and GFI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (19.88%) compared to ATAT (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATAT dropped -46.91% vs GFI's -88.05%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATAT and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer