ASMU vs. OOQB
ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASMU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.
Performance
ASMU vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASMU
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 50.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.99%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMU vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 30.81% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMU and OOQB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMU vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
ASMU
OOQB
ASMU vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | -0.41 | +1.90 |
Drawdowns
ASMU vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum OOQB drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and OOQB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -53.44% | +18.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -43.69% | +43.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -23.26% | +9.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.11% | — |
Volatility
ASMU vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMU | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.13% | 51.57% | +43.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 58.12% | +37.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 58.12% | +37.01% |
ASMU vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMU vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than OOQB's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 0.16% | 0.00% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMU and OOQB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ASMU.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 0.16% for ASMU.
ASMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 0.75% for OOQB.
Find the right allocation for ASMU and OOQB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer