ASMU vs. SPXS
ASMU (Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF) and SPXS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ASMU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while SPXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). ASMU is actively managed, while SPXS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.69, they often move in opposite directions. ASMU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SPXS.
Performance
ASMU vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASMU
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 50.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXS
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- -13.11%
- YTD
- -25.49%
- 6M
- -24.86%
- 1Y
- -48.73%
- 3Y*
- -42.68%
- 5Y*
- -34.76%
- 10Y*
- -42.01%
ASMU vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 30.81% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | -22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASMU and SPXS is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | -0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASMU vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank
ASMU
SPXS
ASMU vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF (ASMU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASMU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.49 | -0.83 | +2.32 |
Drawdowns
ASMU vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASMU drawdown since its inception was -34.79%, smaller than the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMU and SPXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASMU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.79% | -100.00% | +65.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -50.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -100.00% | +100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.52% | -96.30% | +82.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.04% | — |
Volatility
ASMU vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASMU | SPXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 95.13% | 35.54% | +59.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 50.39% | +44.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.13% | 53.54% | +41.59% |
ASMU vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASMU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASMU vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison
ASMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than SPXS's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMU Direxion Daily ASML Bull 2X ETF | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXS Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares | 4.91% | 4.93% | 6.18% | 5.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 1.74% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASMU and SPXS have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SPXS.
SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.16% for ASMU.
ASMU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for ASMU and 1.08% for SPXS.
Find the right allocation for ASMU and SPXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer