ASML vs. NVT
ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) and NVT (nVent Electric plc) are both stocks. ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while NVT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ASML returned 21.93%/yr vs 40.23%/yr for NVT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASML vs. NVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ASML having a 64.06% return and NVT slightly lower at 61.19%.
ASML
- 1D
- 6.54%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 64.06%
- 6M
- 56.76%
- 1Y
- 134.10%
- 3Y*
- 36.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- 34.75%
NVT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -3.61%
- YTD
- 61.19%
- 6M
- 53.45%
- 1Y
- 142.75%
- 3Y*
- 52.77%
- 5Y*
- 40.23%
- 10Y*
- —
ASML vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 64.06% | 56.51% | -7.70% | 39.91% | -30.49% | 64.13% | 66.06% | 93.56% | -18.71% |
NVT nVent Electric plc | 61.19% | 51.27% | 16.63% | 55.98% | 3.32% | 67.15% | -5.68% | 17.24% | 0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASML and NVT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018 | 0.46 |
The correlation between ASML and NVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
ASML:
$674.60B
NVT:
$26.86B
ASML:
$25.86
NVT:
$3.00
ASML:
67.64
NVT:
54.65
ASML:
4.45
NVT:
1.32
ASML:
20.10
NVT:
6.21
ASML:
32.39
NVT:
7.08
ASML:
$33.69B
NVT:
$4.33B
ASML:
$17.72B
NVT:
$1.60B
ASML:
$12.99B
NVT:
$857.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASML vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank
ASML
NVT
ASML vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASML | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.52 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.56 | 8.48 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.33 | 29.48 | -9.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASML | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 3.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.13 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.79 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
ASML vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASML drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASML and NVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASML | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.00% | -56.18% | -33.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -16.93% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.38% | -46.67% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.84% | -46.67% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -7.13% | +6.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.14% | -11.83% | -16.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 4.86% | +1.76% |
Volatility
ASML vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison
ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a higher volatility of 15.94% compared to nVent Electric plc (NVT) at 11.44%. This indicates that ASML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASML | NVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.94% | 11.44% | +4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.30% | 31.94% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.73% | 40.76% | +0.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 35.96% | +6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.62% | 38.38% | +0.24% |
Dividends
ASML vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison
ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, which matches NVT's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.50% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
NVT nVent Electric plc | 0.50% | 0.78% | 1.12% | 1.18% | 1.82% | 1.84% | 3.01% | 2.74% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ASML vs. NVT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ASML Holding N.V. and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ASML vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.65B and revenue of 8.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
NVT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.16B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.0%.
NVT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 8.77B, resulting in a net margin of 31.4%.
NVT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ASML and NVT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASML has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to NVT (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASML dropped -90.00% vs NVT's -56.18%.
NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASML and NVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer