ASMH vs. TRUT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ASMH is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.

Performance

ASMH vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 71.95% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 16.13% return.

ASMH

• 1D: -7.22%
• 1M: 10.92%
• YTD: 71.95%
• 6M: 74.08%
• 1Y: 135.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRUT

• 1D: -3.32%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 16.13%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	71.95%	42.48%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	16.13%	9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and TRUT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 91
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 93

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASMH	TRUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.08	—	—

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum TRUT drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and TRUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMH	TRUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-18.55%	+2.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.89%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.22%	-8.67%	+1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.19%	-5.27%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASMH	TRUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.85%	23.21%	+18.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.28%	23.21%	+17.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.28%	23.21%	+17.07%

ASMH vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ASMH vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than TRUT's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	1.62%	0.19%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.20%	0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMH and TRUT in my portfolio?

ASMH and TRUT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ASMH or TRUT?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMH or TRUT?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ASMH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMH or TRUT?

ASMH has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between ASMH and TRUT?

They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ASMH and 0.13% for TRUT.