ASMH vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ASMH returned 130.11% vs 23.78% for CRTC. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ASMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

ASMH vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASMH achieves a 63.99% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 8.59% return.

ASMH

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 25.24%
• YTD: 63.99%
• 6M: 53.18%
• 1Y: 130.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASMH vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	63.99%	58.84%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	8.59%	29.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ASMH and CRTC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025	0.54

The correlation between ASMH and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASMH vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASMH

ASMH Risk / Return Rank: 88
ASMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ASMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ASMH Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASMH Martin Ratio Rank: 90

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASMH vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASMH	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	1.87	+1.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	2.56	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.32	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.24	2.64	+5.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.26	9.88	+11.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASMH vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASMH Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is higher than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASMH and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASMH	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	1.87	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.59	1.36	+2.23

Drawdowns

ASMH vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASMH drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, smaller than the maximum CRTC drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASMH and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASMH	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.89%	-19.07%	+3.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.89%	-9.05%	-6.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.27%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-2.13%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.14%	2.41%	+3.73%

Volatility

ASMH vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a higher volatility of 13.84% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that ASMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASMH	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.84%	3.20%	+10.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.43%	9.64%	+20.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.94%	12.76%	+26.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.32%	15.73%	+22.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.32%	15.73%	+22.59%

ASMH vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASMH vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

ASMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, which matches CRTC's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF	0.99%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.00%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASMH and CRTC in my portfolio?

ASMH and CRTC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASMH or CRTC?

ASMH has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASMH dropped -15.89% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, ASMH or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 130.11% vs 23.78% for CRTC. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASMH or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 130.11% return vs 23.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASMH or CRTC?

ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CRTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASMH or CRTC?

ASMH and CRTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.99%.

What is the main difference between ASMH and CRTC?

ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: Precidian Funds and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ASMH and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.