PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASM vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASM achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ASM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 16.51%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


ASM

1D
-8.09%
1M
7.57%
YTD
9.82%
6M
22.00%
1Y
97.68%
3Y*
111.58%
5Y*
39.52%
10Y*
16.51%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
9.82%604.88%68.13%-22.95%-21.01%-33.77%124.14%-4.92%-54.48%-2.19%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ASM and VGT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2005

0.14

Over the past year, ASM and VGT have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASM
ASM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ASM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ASM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASMVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.47

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.69

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.20

11.77

-7.57

ASM vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASM Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASM and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASMVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.95

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.89

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

1.05

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.68

-0.59

Drawdowns

ASM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASM drawdown since its inception was -94.10%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASMVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.10%

-54.63%

-39.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.40%

-16.40%

-36.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.40%

-27.23%

-25.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.51%

-35.07%

-33.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.91%

-35.07%

-55.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.32%

-1.48%

-37.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.79%

-7.95%

-55.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.32%

5.13%

+18.19%

Volatility

ASM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) has a higher volatility of 22.92% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 6.39%. This indicates that ASM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASMVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.92%

6.39%

+16.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.55%

16.07%

+46.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.93%

20.57%

+59.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.51%

25.18%

+40.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.87%

24.60%

+45.27%

Dividends

ASM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

ASM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASM and VGT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASM has higher volatility (22.92%) compared to VGT (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASM dropped -94.10% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASM and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer