ASM.TO vs. SI=F

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) and Silver (SI=F).

Performance

ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) and Silver (SI=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASM.TO Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.	3.40%	577.78%	82.61%	-25.00%	-17.12%	-32.73%	120.00%	-10.71%	-51.16%	-6.01%
SI=F Silver	7.55%	130.37%	31.84%	-2.02%	10.28%	-12.38%	44.89%	9.65%	-1.67%	0.40%

Different Trading Currencies

ASM.TO is traded in CAD, while SI=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SI=F values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASM.TO achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly lower than SI=F's 7.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ASM.TO has outperformed SI=F with an annualized return of 21.02%, while SI=F has yielded a comparatively lower 18.20% annualized return.

ASM.TO

• 1D: 9.01%
• 1M: -32.70%
• YTD: 3.40%
• 6M: 20.96%
• 1Y: 233.21%
• 3Y*: 93.97%
• 5Y*: 40.90%
• 10Y*: 21.02%

SI=F

• 1D: 6.05%
• 1M: -14.24%
• YTD: 7.55%
• 6M: 58.11%
• 1Y: 112.33%
• 3Y*: 47.04%
• 5Y*: 27.18%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ASM.TO vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASM.TO

ASM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
ASM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ASM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ASM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ASM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ASM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SI=F

SI=F Risk / Return Rank: 78
SI=F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
SI=F Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
SI=F Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SI=F Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SI=F Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ASM.TO	SI=F	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.49	+1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	1.87	+1.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.34	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.36	3.21	+1.15
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.29	8.98	+4.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the SI=F Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASM.TO and SI=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASM.TO	SI=F	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.49	+1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.71	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.54	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.36	-0.33

Correlation

The correlation between ASM.TO and SI=F is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Drawdowns

ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASM.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.61%, which is greater than SI=F's maximum drawdown of -62.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM.TO and SI=F.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASM.TO	SI=F	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.61%	-91.54%	-4.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.03%	-41.00%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.29%	-41.00%	-24.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.69%	-43.13%	-46.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.14%	-34.94%	-7.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.31%	-61.14%	-4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.09%	14.41%	+2.68%

Volatility

ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) has a higher volatility of 27.97% compared to Silver (SI=F) at 17.82%. This indicates that ASM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SI=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASM.TO	SI=F	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.97%	17.82%	+10.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.11%	61.67%	+5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.43%	58.21%	+24.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.11%	35.92%	+30.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.69%	31.98%	+37.71%