ASM.TO vs. SI=F
ASM.TO (Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.) is a stock, while SI=F (Silver) is an asset. Over the past 10 years, ASM.TO returned 17.24%/yr vs 17.32%/yr for SI=F. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ASM.TO is traded in CAD, while SI=F is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SI=F values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASM.TO achieves a 10.89% return, which is significantly higher than SI=F's 7.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ASM.TO having a 17.24% annualized return and SI=F not far ahead at 17.32%.
ASM.TO
- 1D
- -7.88%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 10.89%
- 6M
- 21.41%
- 1Y
- 99.79%
- 3Y*
- 113.73%
- 5Y*
- 43.62%
- 10Y*
- 17.24%
SI=F
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 27.87%
- 1Y
- 120.07%
- 3Y*
- 48.36%
- 5Y*
- 25.73%
- 10Y*
- 17.32%
ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASM.TO Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. | 10.89% | 577.78% | 82.61% | -25.00% | -17.12% | -32.73% | 120.00% | -10.71% | -51.16% | -6.01% |
SI=F Silver | 7.93% | 130.37% | 31.84% | -2.02% | 10.28% | -12.38% | 44.89% | 9.65% | -1.67% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASM.TO and SI=F is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASM.TO vs. SI=F — Risk / Return Rank
ASM.TO
SI=F
ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) and Silver (SI=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASM.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.29 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 4.88 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASM.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.57 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.65 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.51 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.35 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASM.TO drawdown since its inception was -95.61%, which is greater than SI=F's maximum drawdown of -62.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASM.TO and SI=F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASM.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.61% | -62.82% | -32.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.03% | -40.56% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.03% | -40.56% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.58% | -40.56% | -23.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.69% | -40.72% | -48.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.94% | -33.75% | -4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.15% | -34.41% | -30.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.99% | 20.81% | +2.18% |
Volatility
ASM.TO vs. SI=F - Volatility Comparison
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM.TO) has a higher volatility of 23.51% compared to Silver (SI=F) at 14.54%. This indicates that ASM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SI=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASM.TO | SI=F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.51% | 14.54% | +8.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.18% | 59.90% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.71% | 59.32% | +20.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.78% | 36.68% | +30.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.38% | 32.45% | +36.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASM.TO and SI=F have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ASM.TO and SI=F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer