PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ASIL.L

1D
-2.60%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-6.20%
6M
-8.10%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
-5.81%
10Y*
0.63%

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASIL.L
Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF
-6.20%27.56%14.40%-17.94%-16.69%-22.70%-4.32%9.43%-6.32%9.99%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%23.29%-4.10%6.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIL.L and MWRD.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2017

0.44

The correlation between ASIL.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASIL.L
MWRD.L

Consumer Cyclical

29.8%
10.5%

Communication Services

21.2%
7.5%

Financial Services

19.0%
14.7%

Technology

11.7%
24.7%

Healthcare

5.9%
12.4%

Industrials

4.4%
10.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
6.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
2.4%

Utilities

0.6%
2.4%

Energy

-

4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ASIL.L
29.8%
MWRD.L
10.5%

Communication Services

ASIL.L
21.2%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Financial Services

ASIL.L
19.0%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Technology

ASIL.L
11.7%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Healthcare

ASIL.L
5.9%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Industrials

ASIL.L
4.4%
MWRD.L
10.6%

Basic Materials

ASIL.L
3.1%
MWRD.L
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

ASIL.L
2.8%
MWRD.L
6.7%

Real Estate

ASIL.L
1.5%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Utilities

ASIL.L
0.6%
MWRD.L
2.4%

Energy

ASIL.L

-

MWRD.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIL.L
ASIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ASIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASIL.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASIL.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

Drawdowns

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASIL.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.01%

Volatility

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASIL.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.11%

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIL.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASIL.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASIL.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ASIL.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MWRD.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASIL.L.

ASIL.L is categorized as China Equities, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. ASIL.L tracks MSCI China NR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASIL.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIL.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer