ASIL.L vs. MOAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT).
ASIL.L and MOAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASIL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Feb 21, 2019. MOAT is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2012. Both ASIL.L and MOAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASIL.L or MOAT.
Key characteristics
| ASIL.L | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.26% | 5.71% |
| 1Y Return | -6.13% | 23.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -14.79% | 8.35% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -10.38% | 15.27% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.96% | 13.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.21 | 1.66 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.36% | 13.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.17% | -33.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.04% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIL.L and MOAT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ASIL.L vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ASIL.L achieves a 10.26% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 5.71% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of -0.96%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASIL.L vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIL.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASIL.L vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASIL.L vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
ASIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MOAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 0.81% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% | 1.34% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
ASIL.L vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIL.L drawdown since its inception was -59.17%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIL.L and MOAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASIL.L vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) at 2.48%. This indicates that ASIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.