ASIL.L vs. ASHR
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR).
ASIL.L and ASHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASIL.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Feb 21, 2019. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. Both ASIL.L and ASHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASIL.L or ASHR.
Key characteristics
| ASIL.L | ASHR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 12.38% | 4.85% |
| 1Y Return | -3.64% | -9.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -14.28% | -13.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -10.03% | 0.52% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -0.72% | 5.16% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.11 | -0.55 |
| Daily Std Dev | 25.43% | 17.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.17% | -51.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -48.06% | -43.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIL.L and ASHR is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ASIL.L vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ASIL.L achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's 4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L has underperformed ASHR with an annualized return of -0.72%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively higher 5.16% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASIL.L vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ASIL.L and ASHR have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASIL.L vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASIL.L vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
ASIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.36% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% |
Drawdowns
ASIL.L vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIL.L drawdown since its inception was -59.17%, which is greater than ASHR's maximum drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIL.L and ASHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASIL.L vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 4.42%. This indicates that ASIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.