PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIL.L vs. ^HSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and Hang Seng Index (^HSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ASIL.L is traded in GBp, while ^HSI is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the ^HSI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIL.L achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly lower than ^HSI's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L has underperformed ^HSI with an annualized return of 0.63%, while ^HSI has yielded a comparatively higher 2.76% annualized return.


ASIL.L

1D
-2.60%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-6.20%
6M
-8.10%
1Y
8.93%
3Y*
6.75%
5Y*
-5.81%
10Y*
0.63%

^HSI

1D
-1.28%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
7.88%
5Y*
-1.53%
10Y*
2.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASIL.L
Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF
-6.20%27.56%14.40%-17.94%-16.69%-22.70%-4.32%9.43%-6.32%15.81%
^HSI
Hang Seng Index
-0.28%18.46%20.34%-18.12%-5.57%-13.75%-5.78%5.47%-8.71%23.32%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIL.L and ^HSI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2012

0.65

The correlation between ASIL.L and ^HSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIL.L vs. ^HSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIL.L
ASIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ASIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

^HSI
^HSI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
^HSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^HSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
^HSI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
^HSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
^HSI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and Hang Seng Index (^HSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASIL.L^HSIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.10

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

0.83

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

2.09

-1.10

ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIL.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is comparable to the ^HSI Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIL.L and ^HSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASIL.L^HSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

0.55

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

-0.06

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.13

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.13

-0.12

Drawdowns

ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIL.L drawdown since its inception was -59.17%, which is greater than ^HSI's maximum drawdown of -53.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIL.L and ^HSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASIL.L^HSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.17%

-53.73%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.73%

-12.25%

-5.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.68%

-24.96%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.45%

-44.62%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.17%

-49.94%

-9.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.74%

-18.96%

-17.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.72%

-17.20%

-7.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.01%

4.83%

+4.18%

Volatility

ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Hang Seng Index (^HSI) at 5.22%. This indicates that ASIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^HSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASIL.L^HSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

5.22%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.30%

14.05%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

18.78%

+0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.76%

25.41%

+3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.11%

22.37%

+2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASIL.L and ^HSI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIL.L and ^HSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer