ASIL.L vs. ^HSI
ASIL.L (Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China NR USD, while ^HSI (Hang Seng Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L returned 0.63%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for ^HSI. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ASIL.L is traded in GBp, while ^HSI is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the ^HSI values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIL.L achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly lower than ^HSI's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L has underperformed ^HSI with an annualized return of 0.63%, while ^HSI has yielded a comparatively higher 2.76% annualized return.
ASIL.L
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -8.10%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.81%
- 10Y*
- 0.63%
^HSI
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- -1.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.76%
ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | -6.20% | 27.56% | 14.40% | -17.94% | -16.69% | -22.70% | -4.32% | 9.43% | -6.32% | 15.81% |
^HSI Hang Seng Index | -0.28% | 18.46% | 20.34% | -18.12% | -5.57% | -13.75% | -5.78% | 5.47% | -8.71% | 23.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIL.L and ^HSI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2012 | 0.65 |
The correlation between ASIL.L and ^HSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASIL.L vs. ^HSI — Risk / Return Rank
ASIL.L
^HSI
ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and Hang Seng Index (^HSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASIL.L | ^HSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.10 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.83 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | 2.09 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASIL.L | ^HSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | -0.06 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.13 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.13 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIL.L drawdown since its inception was -59.17%, which is greater than ^HSI's maximum drawdown of -53.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIL.L and ^HSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIL.L | ^HSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.17% | -53.73% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.73% | -12.25% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.68% | -24.96% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.45% | -44.62% | -8.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.17% | -49.94% | -9.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.74% | -18.96% | -17.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -17.20% | -7.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.01% | 4.83% | +4.18% |
Volatility
ASIL.L vs. ^HSI - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to Hang Seng Index (^HSI) at 5.22%. This indicates that ASIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^HSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASIL.L | ^HSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 5.22% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 14.05% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 18.78% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 25.41% | +3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 22.37% | +2.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIL.L and ^HSI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ASIL.L and ^HSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer