MWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE).

MWRD.L and 36BZ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MWRD.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 11, 2016. 36BZ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. Both MWRD.L and 36BZ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

MWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World	0.00%	0.00%	-1.27%	17.50%	-9.18%	24.39%	11.85%	23.29%	-4.10%	6.52%
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	1.04%	15.98%	14.68%	-18.78%	-16.95%	5.41%	35.75%	30.07%	-22.41%	10.77%

Different Trading Currencies

MWRD.L is traded in GBp, while 36BZ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 36BZ.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

MWRD.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

36BZ.DE

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -3.49%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 2.87%
• 1Y: 22.68%
• 3Y*: 2.41%
• 5Y*: -0.43%
• 10Y*: 5.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MWRD.L has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

36BZ.DE

iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF

MWRD.L

Amundi Index MSCI World

Return for Risk

MWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36BZ.DE

36BZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
36BZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
36BZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
36BZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 49
36BZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
36BZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MWRD.L	36BZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.06	—

Correlation

The correlation between MWRD.L and 36BZ.DE is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MWRD.L vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither MWRD.L nor 36BZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MWRD.L	36BZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.30%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-17.56%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-30.47%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MWRD.L	36BZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.48%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	21.36%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	22.48%	—