ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L
ASIL.L (Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF) and HMCH.L (HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds tracking the MSCI China NR USD, from Amundi and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L returned 0.63%/yr vs 5.90%/yr for HMCH.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASIL.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HMCH.L.
Performance
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASIL.L achieves a -6.20% return, which is significantly higher than HMCH.L's -6.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ASIL.L has underperformed HMCH.L with an annualized return of 0.63%, while HMCH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.90% annualized return.
ASIL.L
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- -6.20%
- 6M
- -8.10%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 6.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.81%
- 10Y*
- 0.63%
HMCH.L
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -8.22%
- 1Y
- 8.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- -4.01%
- 10Y*
- 5.90%
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | -6.20% | 27.56% | 14.40% | -17.94% | -16.69% | -22.70% | -4.32% | 9.43% | -6.32% | 15.81% |
HMCH.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | -6.67% | 22.87% | 20.73% | -16.33% | -13.40% | -21.06% | 24.96% | 17.80% | -14.28% | 40.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASIL.L and HMCH.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2012 | 0.94 |
The correlation between ASIL.L and HMCH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Communication Services
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Financial Services
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Technology
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Healthcare
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Industrials
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Basic Materials
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Consumer Defensive
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Real Estate
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Utilities
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
Energy
ASIL.L
-
HMCH.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L — Risk / Return Rank
ASIL.L
HMCH.L
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ASIL.L | HMCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.48 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | 1.02 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ASIL.L | HMCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.20 | -0.15 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.23 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.17 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASIL.L drawdown since its inception was -59.17%, roughly equal to the maximum HMCH.L drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIL.L and HMCH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASIL.L | HMCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.17% | -56.50% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.73% | -17.18% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.68% | -24.67% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.45% | -49.31% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.17% | -56.50% | -2.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.74% | -32.25% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.72% | -20.25% | -4.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.01% | 8.12% | +0.89% |
Volatility
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF (ASIL.L) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L) at 7.03%. This indicates that ASIL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASIL.L | HMCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 7.03% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.30% | 13.16% | +1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.71% | 18.47% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 27.66% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.11% | 25.21% | -0.10% |
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASIL.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HMCH.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASIL.L vs. HMCH.L - Dividend Comparison
ASIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASIL.L Lyxor China Enterprise (HSCEI) UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMCH.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | 2.14% | 2.34% | 2.17% | 2.12% | 1.85% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.78% | 1.89% | 2.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASIL.L and HMCH.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HMCH.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HMCH.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASIL.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASIL.L and 0.30% for HMCH.L.
Find the right allocation for ASIL.L and HMCH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer