HMCH.L vs. BYDDY
Compare and contrast key facts about HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY).
HMCH.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: HMCH.L or BYDDY.
Correlation
The correlation between HMCH.L and BYDDY is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
HMCH.L vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
HMCH.L:
1.67
BYDDY:
3.05
HMCH.L:
2.38
BYDDY:
3.74
HMCH.L:
1.31
BYDDY:
1.45
HMCH.L:
0.83
BYDDY:
2.13
HMCH.L:
4.28
BYDDY:
11.50
HMCH.L:
10.43%
BYDDY:
10.41%
HMCH.L:
26.65%
BYDDY:
39.36%
HMCH.L:
-56.50%
BYDDY:
-97.37%
HMCH.L:
-30.08%
BYDDY:
-4.68%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HMCH.L achieves a 18.35% return, which is significantly lower than BYDDY's 48.45% return. Over the past 10 years, HMCH.L has underperformed BYDDY with an annualized return of 4.76%, while BYDDY has yielded a comparatively higher 28.27% annualized return.
HMCH.L
18.35%
18.69%
40.59%
44.63%
0.64%
4.76%
BYDDY
48.45%
44.93%
73.61%
117.73%
53.34%
28.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
HMCH.L vs. BYDDY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
HMCH.L
BYDDY
HMCH.L vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
HMCH.L vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison
HMCH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than BYDDY's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HMCH.L HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF | 2.00% | 2.17% | 2.12% | 1.85% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.78% | 1.89% | 2.84% | 1.68% |
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR | 0.85% | 1.26% | 0.60% | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.03% | 0.60% | 0.36% | 0.30% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
Drawdowns
HMCH.L vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HMCH.L drawdown since its inception was -56.50%, smaller than the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -97.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HMCH.L and BYDDY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
HMCH.L vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF (HMCH.L) is 6.33%, while BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) has a volatility of 15.02%. This indicates that HMCH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.