ASIA vs. MEGMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ASIA (Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF) and MEGMX (Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund) are both funds - ASIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews, while MEGMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by Matthews. Over the past year, ASIA returned 58.06% vs 63.29% for MEGMX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASIA charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for MEGMX.

Performance

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 29.48% return, which is significantly lower than MEGMX's 39.17% return.

ASIA

• 1D: -6.60%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 29.48%
• 6M: 31.09%
• 1Y: 58.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEGMX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 10.14%
• YTD: 39.17%
• 6M: 40.98%
• 1Y: 63.29%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	29.48%	32.06%	3.41%	0.01%
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	39.17%	29.37%	11.11%	6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA and MEGMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2023	0.88

The correlation between ASIA and MEGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ASIA vs. MEGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIA

ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 76
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 78

MEGMX

MEGMX Risk / Return Rank: 88
MEGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MEGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MEGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MEGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
MEGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASIA	MEGMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.94	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.63	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.56	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	4.31	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	16.06	-1.79

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIA Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the MEGMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA and MEGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, smaller than the maximum MEGMX drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and MEGMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASIA	MEGMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.95%	-37.64%	+13.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.47%	-15.34%	+0.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.60%	0.00%	-6.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.84%	-14.48%	+9.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.08%	4.06%	+0.02%

Volatility

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a higher volatility of 15.17% compared to Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund (MEGMX) at 12.70%. This indicates that ASIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASIA	MEGMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.17%	12.70%	+2.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.95%	20.69%	+2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.30%	22.55%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.63%	18.30%	+3.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.63%	18.25%	+3.38%

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MEGMX's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASIA vs. MEGMX - Dividend Comparison

ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than MEGMX's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	0.81%	1.05%	0.58%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MEGMX Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Fund	2.14%	2.97%	0.92%	1.82%	1.81%	7.76%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASIA and MEGMX in my portfolio?

ASIA and MEGMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASIA or MEGMX?

ASIA has higher volatility (15.17%) compared to MEGMX (12.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIA dropped -23.95% vs MEGMX's -37.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MEGMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.