PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASIA vs. MCHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASIA vs. MCHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASIA achieves a 18.76% return, which is significantly lower than MCHS's 31.65% return.


ASIA

1D
-3.05%
1M
-8.90%
6M
11.70%
YTD
18.76%
1Y
37.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MCHS

1D
-5.71%
1M
-10.31%
6M
24.60%
YTD
31.65%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASIA vs. MCHS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
18.76%32.06%8.71%
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
31.65%31.19%6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ASIA and MCHS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.64

The correlation between ASIA and MCHS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASIA vs. MCHS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASIA
MCHS

Technology

60.2%
49.7%

Financial Services

16.2%

-

Industrials

7.4%
27.8%

Communication Services

4.8%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
4.5%

Energy

2.5%
6.3%

Healthcare

2.5%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.7%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
0.8%

Basic Materials

1.1%
8.1%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

ASIA
60.2%
MCHS
49.7%

Financial Services

ASIA
16.2%
MCHS

-

Industrials

ASIA
7.4%
MCHS
27.8%

Communication Services

ASIA
4.8%
MCHS
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ASIA
3.6%
MCHS
4.5%

Energy

ASIA
2.5%
MCHS
6.3%

Healthcare

ASIA
2.5%
MCHS
2.1%

Real Estate

ASIA
1.7%
MCHS
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

ASIA
1.1%
MCHS
0.8%

Basic Materials

ASIA
1.1%
MCHS
8.1%

Utilities

ASIA

-

MCHS
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASIA vs. MCHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASIA
ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MCHS
MCHS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MCHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHS Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASIA vs. MCHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) and Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASIAMCHSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.40

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.99

9.28

-1.29

ASIA vs. MCHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the MCHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASIA and MCHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASIA vs. MCHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASIA drawdown since its inception was -23.95%, roughly equal to the maximum MCHS drawdown of -23.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASIA and MCHS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASIAMCHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.95%

-23.75%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.47%

-18.75%

+4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.33%

-18.75%

+4.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

-7.54%

+2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

4.84%

-0.09%

Volatility

ASIA vs. MCHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) is 12.91%, while Matthews China Discovery Active ETF (MCHS) has a volatility of 16.23%. This indicates that ASIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASIAMCHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.91%

16.23%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.60%

25.92%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.79%

28.77%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.12%

30.01%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

30.01%

-7.89%

ASIA vs. MCHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASIA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MCHS's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASIA vs. MCHS - Dividend Comparison

ASIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than MCHS's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ASIA
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF
0.88%1.05%0.58%0.12%
MCHS
Matthews China Discovery Active ETF
2.71%3.56%5.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASIA and MCHS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCHS has higher volatility (16.23%) compared to ASIA (12.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASIA dropped -23.95% vs MCHS's -23.75%.

On 1-year performance, MCHS leads with 44.77% vs 37.82% for ASIA. On fees, ASIA is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ASIA has been the lower-risk option at 12.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MCHS has performed better with a 44.77% return vs 37.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASIA is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for MCHS.

MCHS has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 0.88% for ASIA.

ASIA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while MCHS is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ASIA and 0.89% for MCHS.

MCHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASIA and MCHS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer