ASHX vs. KSTR
ASHX (Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF) and KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) are both China Equities funds - ASHX tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index while KSTR tracks the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASHX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for KSTR.
Performance
ASHX vs. KSTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ASHX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KSTR
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 10.13%
- YTD
- 51.37%
- 6M
- 53.01%
- 1Y
- 113.73%
- 3Y*
- 23.99%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
ASHX vs. KSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% | -13.59% | -26.45% | -4.04% |
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 51.37% | 42.82% | 6.12% | -17.93% | -38.51% | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHX and KSTR is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021 | 0.48 |
The correlation between ASHX and KSTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ASHX vs. KSTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASHX
KSTR
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ASHX
KSTR
-
Industrials
ASHX
KSTR
Consumer Defensive
ASHX
KSTR
-
Technology
ASHX
KSTR
Basic Materials
ASHX
KSTR
Healthcare
ASHX
KSTR
Consumer Cyclical
ASHX
KSTR
Utilities
ASHX
KSTR
-
Energy
ASHX
KSTR
Communication Services
ASHX
KSTR
-
Real Estate
ASHX
KSTR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHX vs. KSTR — Risk / Return Rank
ASHX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KSTR
ASHX vs. KSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF (ASHX) and KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASHX | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.48 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASHX vs. KSTR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHX | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -66.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -41.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -38.49% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.16% | — |
Volatility
ASHX vs. KSTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHX | KSTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 37.25% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 38.58% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 37.87% | — |
ASHX vs. KSTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KSTR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHX vs. KSTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ASHX nor KSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHX Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.38% | 1.76% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 1.78% | 1.07% | 2.48% | 19.46% | 2.91% |
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHX and KSTR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASHX is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASHX is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.
ASHX and KSTR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
ASHX tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ASHX and 0.89% for KSTR.
Find the right allocation for ASHX and KSTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer