ASHS vs. SBIT
ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASHS is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 500 Index, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ASHS returned 31.86% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.19 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ASHS charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
ASHS vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHS achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.
ASHS
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -11.80%
- 6M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 31.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.02%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.12%
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.60%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- 6M
- 32.41%
- YTD
- 39.44%
- 1Y
- 98.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -42.65%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $378.39K | $628.93K | $596.17K | |
| $29.57M | $32.71M | $46.48M |
ASHS vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 5.42% | 39.48% | 4.36% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 39.44% | -25.11% | -73.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHS and SBIT is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHS vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ASHS
SBIT
ASHS vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASHS | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.35 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 5.19 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASHS vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHS drawdown since its inception was -69.90%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHS and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHS | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.90% | -91.35% | +21.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -47.94% | +30.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.15% | -77.87% | +38.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.36% | -69.07% | +20.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 21.67% | -15.91% |
Volatility
ASHS vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) is 12.45%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that ASHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHS | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.45% | 18.09% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.30% | 67.10% | -45.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.59% | 88.65% | -62.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.11% | 96.10% | -68.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.86% | 96.10% | -70.24% |
ASHS vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHS vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.90% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 4.03% | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHS and SBIT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SBIT has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to ASHS (12.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHS dropped -69.90% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs 31.86% for ASHS. On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ASHS has been the lower-risk option at 12.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs 31.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.00% for ASHS.
ASHS is categorized as China Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. ASHS tracks CSI 500 Index, while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHS and 0.95% for SBIT.
SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASHS and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer