ASHR vs. SHV
ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) and SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index, while SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASHR returned 5.65%/yr vs 2.23%/yr for SHV. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. ASHR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SHV.
Performance
ASHR vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 7.49% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed SHV with an annualized return of 5.65%, while SHV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.
ASHR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 7.49%
- 6M
- 9.62%
- 1Y
- 35.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- -1.32%
- 10Y*
- 5.65%
SHV
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
ASHR vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 7.49% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -28.45% | 33.47% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.53% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and SHV is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013 | -0.03 |
The correlation between ASHR and SHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHR vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
ASHR
SHV
ASHR vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASHR | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -146.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 53.77 | -52.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 431.38 | -426.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.89 | 2,419.80 | -2,406.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and SHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHR | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.30% | -0.45% | -50.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -0.01% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.12% | -0.03% | -33.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.59% | -0.39% | -44.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.30% | -0.45% | -50.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.64% | 0.00% | -17.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.15% | -0.03% | -29.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 0.00% | +2.63% |
Volatility
ASHR vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.04%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHR | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 0.04% | +6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.08% | 0.12% | +11.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.24% | 0.20% | +17.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 0.29% | +23.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 0.28% | +23.78% |
ASHR vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHR vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than SHV's 3.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.15% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHR and SHV have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASHR has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to SHV (0.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHR dropped -51.30% vs SHV's -0.45%.
On 10-year performance, ASHR leads with 5.65% vs 2.23% for SHV. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ASHR has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.
SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 2.15% for ASHR.
ASHR is categorized as China Equities, while SHV is Government Bonds. ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index, while SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHR and 0.15% for SHV.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASHR and SHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer