PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASGM vs. QTAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASGM vs. QTAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) and Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASGM achieves a 22.52% return, which is significantly higher than QTAC's 3.12% return.


ASGM

1D
-0.53%
1M
7.21%
YTD
22.52%
6M
24.07%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAC

1D
-0.30%
1M
14.39%
YTD
3.12%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASGM vs. QTAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASGM and QTAC is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASGM vs. QTAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM) and Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF (QTAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASGM vs. QTAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASGMQTACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.95

0.33

+2.62

Drawdowns

ASGM vs. QTAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASGM drawdown since its inception was -6.62%, smaller than the maximum QTAC drawdown of -16.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASGM and QTAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASGMQTACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-16.56%

+9.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.62%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-6.70%

+5.48%

Volatility

ASGM vs. QTAC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASGMQTACDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

24.15%

-8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.67%

24.15%

-8.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

24.15%

-8.48%

ASGM vs. QTAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASGM has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAC's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASGM vs. QTAC - Dividend Comparison

ASGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than QTAC's 0.05% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASGM and QTAC have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASGM is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASGM is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.78% for QTAC.

ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 0.05% for QTAC.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Q3 Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for ASGM and 1.78% for QTAC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASGM and QTAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer