ASET vs. EAOA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - ASET tracks the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return while EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. ASET charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.

Performance

ASET vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

EAOA

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 6.89%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 1Y: 19.83%
• 3Y*: 15.23%
• 5Y*: 8.17%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	$23.58K	$40.91K	$70.98K

ASET vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	8.32%

Return for Risk

ASET vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EAOA

EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 70
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 69
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASET vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASET	EAOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.60	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.27	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.30	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.67	—

Drawdowns

ASET vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and EAOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASET	EAOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-25.06%	+25.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.22%	+1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-5.21%	+5.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASET	EAOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	11.73%	-11.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	13.39%	-13.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	13.16%	-13.16%

ASET vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASET vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EAOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	1.99%	2.10%	2.09%	2.21%	1.93%	1.48%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASET or EAOA?

On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASET or EAOA?

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASET or EAOA?

EAOA has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between ASET and EAOA?

ASET tracks Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.18% for EAOA.