ASET vs. CGBL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) and CGBL (Capital Group Core Balanced ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASET is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Northern Trust Real Assets Allocation Total Return, while CGBL is a Allocation--50% to 70% Equity fund actively managed by Capital Group. ASET is passively managed, while CGBL is actively managed. ASET charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGBL.

Performance

ASET vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGBL

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.93%
• 6M: 3.34%
• YTD: 6.15%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASET vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	5.13%

Return for Risk

ASET vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CGBL

CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 43
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 41
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASET	CGBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.22	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.79	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.86	—

Drawdowns

ASET vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CGBL drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and CGBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASET	CGBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-11.66%	+11.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.88%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.05%	+2.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-1.28%	+1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.83%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASET	CGBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	10.29%	-10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	11.12%	-11.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	11.12%	-11.12%

ASET vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASET vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	1.88%	1.98%	1.92%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ASET or CGBL?

On fees, CGBL is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASET or CGBL?

CGBL is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ASET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASET or CGBL?

CGBL has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

What is the main difference between ASET and CGBL?

ASET is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while CGBL is Allocation--50% to 70% Equity. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ASET and 0.33% for CGBL.