PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASET vs. CGBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ASET vs. CGBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASET vs. CGBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CGBL

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
0.29%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASET vs. CGBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASET has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than CGBL's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ASET vs. CGBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASET

CGBL
CGBL Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CGBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CGBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGBL Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASET vs. CGBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET) and Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASET vs. CGBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASETCGBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.47

Dividends

ASET vs. CGBL - Dividend Comparison

ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.


TTM202520242023
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
2.03%1.98%1.92%0.48%

Drawdowns

ASET vs. CGBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASET drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CGBL drawdown of -11.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASET and CGBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ASETCGBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-11.66%

+11.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.26%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-1.31%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

Volatility

ASET vs. CGBL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ASETCGBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

12.41%

-12.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.01%

-11.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

11.01%

-11.01%