ASEA vs. VTV

Last updated Jul 26, 2026

ASEA (Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASEA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASEA returned 7.65%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for VTV. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ASEA charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

ASEA vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ASEA having a 16.39% return and VTV slightly higher at 16.94%. Over the past 10 years, ASEA has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 7.65%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.

ASEA

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 7.14%
• 6M: 9.57%
• YTD: 16.39%
• 1Y: 28.24%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 7.65%
• ALL TIME*: 5.30%

VTV

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 0.73%
• 6M: 13.03%
• YTD: 16.94%
• 1Y: 24.90%
• 3Y*: 17.23%
• 5Y*: 12.51%
• 10Y*: 12.48%
• ALL TIME*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	$593.31K	$523.08K	$605.79K
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$654.06M	$690.11M	$596.84M

ASEA vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	16.39%	19.80%	9.82%	4.88%	5.24%	4.66%	-7.88%	8.34%	-7.58%	35.06%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	16.94%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	26.53%	2.33%	25.66%	-5.47%	17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ASEA and VTV is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2011	0.54

The correlation between ASEA and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ASEA vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASEA	VTV
Financial Services	60.3%	22.4%
Industrials	15.6%	14.3%
Communication Services	8.0%	2.9%
Utilities	4.3%	4.8%
Energy	3.2%	6.9%
Real Estate	2.8%	2.5%
Healthcare	2.2%	15.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	8.7%
Basic Materials	1.5%	3.0%
Consumer Cyclical	0.7%	3.9%
Technology	-	15.3%

Return for Risk

ASEA vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASEA

ASEA Risk / Return Rank: 80
ASEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
ASEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ASEA Omega Ratio Rank: 79
ASEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
ASEA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 92
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASEA vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASEA	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.49	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.60	-0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	4.02	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.85	15.23	-6.38

ASEA vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASEA and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASEA vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASEA drawdown since its inception was -44.16%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASEA and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASEA	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.16%	-59.27%	+15.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.28%	-6.35%	-1.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.20%	-14.52%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.20%	-17.04%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.16%	-36.78%	-7.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	0.00%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-7.82%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	1.67%	+1.46%

Volatility

ASEA vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.48%. This indicates that ASEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASEA	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.50%	2.48%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.74%	7.59%	+4.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.59%	10.28%	+4.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.72%	13.81%	+0.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	16.61%	+0.88%

ASEA vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASEA has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASEA vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

ASEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than VTV's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF	3.71%	3.95%	3.61%	3.76%	2.23%	4.19%	2.27%	2.51%	3.08%	1.59%	2.78%	3.64%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.85%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASEA and VTV in my portfolio?

ASEA and VTV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ASEA or VTV?

ASEA has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to VTV (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASEA dropped -44.16% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, ASEA or VTV?

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs 7.65% for ASEA. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASEA or VTV?

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 7.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASEA or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASEA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASEA or VTV?

ASEA has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.85% for VTV.

What is the main difference between ASEA and VTV?

ASEA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. ASEA tracks FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASEA and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.