PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCE vs. SCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASCE vs. SCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than SCOW's 6.60% return.


ASCE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.25%
6M
21.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCOW

1D
-1.46%
1M
2.00%
YTD
6.60%
6M
5.15%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCE vs. SCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and SCOW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASCE vs. SCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF (SCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ASCE vs. SCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASCESCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.92

0.35

+1.57

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. SCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, smaller than the maximum SCOW drawdown of -10.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and SCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCESCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-10.09%

+0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.46%

+1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-3.20%

+1.10%

Volatility

ASCE vs. SCOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCESCOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

16.94%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

16.94%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

16.94%

+2.31%

ASCE vs. SCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SCOW's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASCE vs. SCOW - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than SCOW's 0.27% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASCE and SCOW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SCOW.

SCOW has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.59% for SCOW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASCE and SCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer