ASCE vs. ISCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) and ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ASCE is actively managed, while ISCB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ASCE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ISCB.

Performance

ASCE vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCE achieves a 22.25% return, which is significantly higher than ISCB's 11.43% return.

ASCE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 22.25%
• 6M: 21.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ISCB

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 2.77%
• YTD: 11.43%
• 6M: 11.42%
• 1Y: 29.48%
• 3Y*: 16.41%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCE vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	22.25%	8.61%
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF	11.43%	9.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCE and ISCB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

ASCE vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCB

ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 56
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCE vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASCE	ISCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.92	0.38	+1.54

Drawdowns

ASCE vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCE drawdown since its inception was -9.22%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCE and ISCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASCE	ISCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.22%	-61.25%	+52.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.39%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	-0.67%	+0.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.10%	-9.80%	+7.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.63%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASCE	ISCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.25%	16.51%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	21.39%	-2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.25%	22.68%	-3.43%

ASCE vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASCE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASCE vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than ISCB's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF	0.18%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF	1.27%	1.38%	1.31%	1.49%	1.63%	1.26%	1.26%	1.25%	1.60%	1.24%	1.58%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASCE and ISCB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, ASCE and ISCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ASCE or ISCB?

On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASCE or ISCB?

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ASCE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASCE or ISCB?

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.18% for ASCE.

What is the main difference between ASCE and ISCB?

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ASCE and 0.04% for ISCB.