ARVR vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ARVR (First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ARVR tracks the Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARVR returned 22.77%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ARVR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

ARVR vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 13.47% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 5.00% return.

ARVR

• 1D: -4.16%
• 1M: -0.36%
• YTD: 13.47%
• 6M: 13.55%
• 1Y: 23.99%
• 3Y*: 22.77%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GINN

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 3.65%
• 1Y: 20.17%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: 5.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARVR vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	13.47%	29.07%	10.11%	43.39%	-17.45%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	5.00%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-20.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ARVR and GINN is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2022	0.89

The correlation between ARVR and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ARVR vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARVR

ARVR Risk / Return Rank: 31
ARVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ARVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
ARVR Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ARVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
ARVR Martin Ratio Rank: 30

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 35
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARVR vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ARVR	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.22	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	1.75	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	1.54	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.05	5.39	-1.34

ARVR vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARVR and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ARVR vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.40%, smaller than the maximum GINN drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ARVR	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.40%	-41.25%	+14.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.73%	-13.18%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.46%	-22.25%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-4.93%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.87%	-13.28%	+7.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.93%	3.75%	+2.18%

Volatility

ARVR vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.81%. This indicates that ARVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ARVR	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.82%	5.81%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.60%	12.92%	+4.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.41%	16.57%	+4.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	21.44%	+2.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.78%	21.07%	+2.71%

ARVR vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARVR vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than GINN's 1.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF	0.47%	0.53%	0.81%	0.11%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.20%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ARVR and GINN in my portfolio?

ARVR and GINN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ARVR or GINN?

ARVR has higher volatility (10.82%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.40% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, ARVR or GINN?

On 3-year performance, ARVR leads with 22.77% vs 18.28% for GINN. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ARVR or GINN?

Over the 3-year period, ARVR has performed better with a 22.77% return vs 18.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ARVR or GINN?

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ARVR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ARVR or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.47% for ARVR.

What is the main difference between ARVR and GINN?

ARVR tracks Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.