ARVR vs. FDL
ARVR (First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ARVR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ARVR returned 24.89%/yr vs 18.97%/yr for FDL. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARVR charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
ARVR vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ARVR achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return.
ARVR
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 11.38%
- YTD
- 18.88%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- 1Y
- 35.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
ARVR vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF | 18.88% | 29.07% | 10.11% | 43.39% | -17.28% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | -3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARVR and FDL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2022 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ARVR and FDL has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ARVR vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ARVR
FDL
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
ARVR
FDL
Communication Services
ARVR
FDL
Healthcare
ARVR
FDL
Industrials
ARVR
FDL
Basic Materials
ARVR
-
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
ARVR
-
FDL
Consumer Defensive
ARVR
-
FDL
Energy
ARVR
-
FDL
Financial Services
ARVR
-
FDL
Real Estate
ARVR
-
FDL
-
Utilities
ARVR
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARVR vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
ARVR
FDL
ARVR vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ARVR | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 2.11 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 3.25 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 5.56 | -3.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.02 | 13.56 | -7.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARVR | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 2.11 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.45 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
ARVR vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARVR drawdown since its inception was -26.25%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARVR and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARVR | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -65.93% | +39.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.73% | -4.27% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.46% | -12.24% | -9.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -2.18% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -9.66% | +3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.83% | 1.75% | +4.08% |
Volatility
ARVR vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF (ARVR) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that ARVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARVR | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 2.85% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | 7.87% | +6.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.31% | 11.28% | +8.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 14.31% | +9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 17.11% | +6.33% |
ARVR vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARVR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARVR vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
ARVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARVR First Trust Indxx Metaverse ETF | 0.45% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 0.11% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARVR and FDL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARVR has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARVR dropped -26.25% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 3-year performance, ARVR leads with 24.89% vs 18.97% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ARVR has performed better with a 24.89% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ARVR.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.45% for ARVR.
ARVR is categorized as Technology Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. ARVR tracks Indxx Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for ARVR and 0.45% for FDL.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ARVR and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer