PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARQQ vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ARQQ vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARQQ achieves a -37.84% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 0.71% return.


ARQQ

1D
-0.66%
1M
-1.66%
YTD
-37.84%
6M
-52.03%
1Y
-49.10%
3Y*
-28.53%
5Y*
10Y*

WM

1D
0.30%
1M
1.83%
YTD
0.71%
6M
2.63%
1Y
-5.98%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARQQ vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ARQQ
Arqit Quantum Inc.
-37.84%-43.67%227.76%-86.87%-84.93%158.92%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
0.71%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ARQQ and WM is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021

0.01

The correlation between ARQQ and WM shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARQQ:

$225.50M

WM:

$88.75B

EPS

ARQQ:

-$4.72

WM:

$6.91

PS Ratio

ARQQ:

151.77

WM:

3.49

PB Ratio

ARQQ:

7.91

WM:

8.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARQQ:

$1.43M

WM:

$25.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARQQ:

-$307.00K

WM:

$5.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARQQ:

-$68.30M

WM:

$6.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARQQ vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARQQ
ARQQ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ARQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ARQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARQQ vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ARQQWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.96

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

-0.36

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-0.79

-0.12

ARQQ vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ARQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARQQ and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARQQ vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARQQ drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than WM's maximum drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQQ and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARQQWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.60%

-77.85%

-21.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.78%

-16.70%

-63.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.76%

-18.14%

-71.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.57%

-10.24%

-88.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.78%

-17.69%

-71.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

53.78%

7.58%

+46.20%

Volatility

ARQQ vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) has a higher volatility of 35.65% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.13%. This indicates that ARQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARQQWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.65%

6.13%

+29.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.49%

14.08%

+50.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.65%

19.03%

+85.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

134.12%

18.62%

+115.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

134.12%

19.54%

+114.58%

Dividends

ARQQ vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

ARQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARQQ
Arqit Quantum Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.61%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Financials

ARQQ vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arqit Quantum Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
623.00K
6.23B
(ARQQ) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ARQQ and WM have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARQQ has higher volatility (35.65%) compared to WM (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ARQQ dropped -99.60% vs WM's -77.85%.

WM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARQQ and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer