PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ARMW vs. BETZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ARMW vs. BETZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) and BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments, while BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. ARMW is actively managed, while BETZ is passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ARMW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BETZ.

Performance

ARMW vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARMW achieves a 356.51% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -8.25% return.

ARMW

1D
-8.12%
1M
40.26%
YTD
356.51%
6M
337.80%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

BETZ

1D
-1.13%
1M
4.42%
YTD
-8.25%
6M
-8.89%
1Y
-9.51%
3Y*
6.28%
5Y*
-8.05%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMW vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF		356.51%-41.28%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		-8.25%-2.29%

Correlation

The correlation between ARMW and BETZ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

0.28

ARMW vs. BETZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ARMW
BETZ

Technology

28.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

96.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ARMW
28.9%
BETZ
2.9%

Basic Materials

ARMW

-

BETZ

-

Communication Services

ARMW

-

BETZ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ARMW

-

BETZ
96.0%

Consumer Defensive

ARMW

-

BETZ

-

Energy

ARMW

-

BETZ

-

Financial Services

ARMW

-

BETZ
0.0%

Healthcare

ARMW

-

BETZ

-

Industrials

ARMW

-

BETZ

-

Real Estate

ARMW

-

BETZ

-

Utilities

ARMW

-

BETZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF

Often compared with ARMW:
ARMW vs. AMDWARMW vs. UNHWARMW vs. CHPYARMW vs. ULTIARMW vs. SCLZARMW vs. CWIIARMW vs. USOY
Often compared with BETZ:
BETZ vs. FDISBETZ vs. ODDSBETZ vs. MGMBETZ vs. HTECBETZ vs. SPYBETZ vs. QQQBETZ vs. BRK-B

Return for Risk

ARMW vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ARMW vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ARMWBETZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

-0.46

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

-0.53

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

0.94

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

-0.33

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

-0.54

—

ARMW vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ARMW vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMW drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum BETZ drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMW and BETZ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ARMWBETZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.47%

-60.82%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-29.20%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-29.20%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-59.79%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

-37.93%

+29.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.32%

-33.81%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

17.53%

—

Volatility

ARMW vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ARMWBETZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

6.37%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

16.49%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.49%

20.69%

+72.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.49%

26.98%

+66.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.49%

27.94%

+65.55%

ARMW vs. BETZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BETZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ARMW vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

ARMW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.59%, more than BETZ's 4.98% yield.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF		22.59%16.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF		4.98%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

ARMW and BETZ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 22.59%, compared with 4.98% for BETZ.

ARMW is categorized as Derivative Income, while BETZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for ARMW and 0.75% for BETZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMW and BETZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer