ARMH vs. VTIP
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while VTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. ARMH is actively managed, while VTIP is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTIP.
Performance
ARMH vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTIP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
ARMH vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and VTIP is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
VTIP
ARMH vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMH | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 471,500.14 | 0.89 | +471,499.25 |
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum VTIP drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and VTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -6.27% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -6.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -1.04% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.00% | 1.50% | +111.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 2.77% | +110.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.00% | 2.74% | +110.26% |
ARMH vs. VTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VTIP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ARMH vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.58% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and VTIP have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ARMH.
VTIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while VTIP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.03% for VTIP.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and VTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer