PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ARMH vs. TRUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ARMH vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ARMH

1D
2.87%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRUT

1D
-1.46%
1M
16.68%
YTD
25.30%
6M
24.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ARMH vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ARMH and TRUT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ARMH vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ARMH vs. TRUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ARMHTRUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

471,500.14

2.39

+471,497.75

Drawdowns

ARMH vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -1.61%, smaller than the maximum TRUT drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and TRUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ARMHTRUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-18.55%

+16.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.46%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-5.17%

+4.77%

Volatility

ARMH vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ARMHTRUTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.00%

21.53%

+91.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.00%

21.53%

+91.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.00%

21.53%

+91.47%

ARMH vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ARMH vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


PositionTTM2025
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
0.19%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


ARMH and TRUT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ARMH.

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

They also come from different issuers: Precidian and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.13% for TRUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ARMH and TRUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer