ARMH vs. SIXL
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while SIXL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Their -0.63 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.
Performance
ARMH vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -24.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SIXL
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $185.31K | $454.05K | $691.73K | |
| $888.40K | $445.35K | $239.38K |
ARMH vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -22.64% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and SIXL is -0.63, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIXL
ARMH vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -48.81%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and SIXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.81% | -16.08% | -32.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.83% | -1.58% | -44.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.50% | -4.49% | -19.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | SIXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.98% | 10.43% | +87.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 12.31% | +85.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.98% | 12.60% | +85.38% |
ARMH vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SIXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF | 2.18% | 2.31% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.45% | 0.67% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and SIXL have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.
SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while SIXL is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.47% for SIXL.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and SIXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer