ARMH vs. KROP
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. ARMH is actively managed, while KROP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.
Performance
ARMH vs. KROP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -4.82%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KROP
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 12.86%
- 3Y*
- 0.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 17.07% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and KROP is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
KROP
ARMH vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ARMH | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2,577.07 | -0.57 | +2,577.64 |
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -4.82%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and KROP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -61.96% | +57.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -48.93% | +44.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | -44.50% | +43.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.99% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | KROP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 122.20% | 16.04% | +106.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 122.20% | 22.27% | +99.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.20% | 22.27% | +99.93% |
ARMH vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.34% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and KROP have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.50% for KROP.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and KROP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer