ARMH vs. DHS
ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) and DHS (WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ARMH is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while DHS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index. ARMH is actively managed, while DHS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. ARMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DHS.
Performance
ARMH vs. DHS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ARMH
- 1D
- -9.46%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DHS
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 12.61%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
ARMH vs. DHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 19.49% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ARMH and DHS is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ARMH vs. DHS — Risk / Return Rank
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DHS
ARMH vs. DHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH) and WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ARMH | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.57 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ARMH vs. DHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ARMH drawdown since its inception was -24.85%, smaller than the maximum DHS drawdown of -67.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARMH and DHS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ARMH | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.85% | -67.25% | +42.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.34% | -1.19% | -15.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -9.53% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
ARMH vs. DHS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ARMH | DHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 122.02% | 10.20% | +111.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 122.02% | 13.88% | +108.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 122.02% | 16.08% | +105.94% |
ARMH vs. DHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ARMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DHS's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
ARMH vs. DHS - Dividend Comparison
ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DHS WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.66% | 4.31% | 3.42% | 3.29% | 4.14% | 3.69% | 3.76% | 3.00% | 3.25% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ARMH and DHS have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DHS.
DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
ARMH is categorized as Technology Equities, while DHS is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ARMH and 0.38% for DHS.
Find the right allocation for ARMH and DHS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer